Subject: Re: Learning Objects: adaptable?
From: Clark Quinn (cquinn@knowledgeplanet.com)
Date: Wed 16 Feb 2000 - 20:22:36 MET
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 11:22:36 -0800 From: Clark Quinn <cquinn@knowledgeplanet.com> Subject: Re: Learning Objects: adaptable?
List address to send message to everyone: ifets-discuss@LISTSERV.READADP.COM
Details of current discussion: http://ifets.ieee.org/discussions/discuss.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Concomitantly, it's important for any "authoring" organization which is
>going to adopt an object orientation to carefully consider what standards
>to use, and to adopt and "enforce" those standards so that objects can
>be reused. Object re-use will take place *within* their organizations,
>not *without*. [Jim]
I'll agree with this in the short term, though I think in the longer term we'll see more flexible use as we build ways to automatically reward authors for using their objects in our systems. -- Clark
-- Clark Quinn KnowledgePlanet.com (510) 768-2408 cquinn@knowledgeplanet.com--------------------------------------------------------- Forum website: http://ifets.ieee.org/ Forum's contact person: kinshuk@massey.ac.nz Info on Join/Leave List: http://ifets.ieee.org/maillist.html ---------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Thu 17 Feb 2000 - 01:26:57 MET