Subject: Essential properties of LO
From: Albert Ip (albert@dls.au.com)
Date: Tue 15 Feb 2000 - 22:52:41 MET
From: "Albert Ip" <albert@dls.au.com> Subject: Essential properties of LO Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 08:52:41 +1100
List address to send message to everyone: ifets-discuss@LISTSERV.READADP.COM
Details of current discussion: http://ifets.ieee.org/discussions/discuss.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 16:45:40 -0800, Jim Schuyler wrote:
>Nothing
>looks good if the graphic approach varies from page to page, grammar and
>wording are variable, and there's no similarity from object to object.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 16:36:45 +1100, Albert Ip wrote:
>In a previous posting, I mentioned about the separation between "content"
>and "functions" and have posted a few examples. Lester Gilbert pointed out
>a third dimension: learning objective.
>
>When all three (content, functions and learning objectives) are rolled into
>a learning object, I would come to the same conclusion as Lester Gilbert.
LO now has four independent sub-component (characteristics) for LO to be
useful and potentially re-use:
content, functions, learning objectives, look and feel :-)
any more?
Albert
---------------------------------------------------------
Forum website: http://ifets.ieee.org/
Forum's contact person: kinshuk@massey.ac.nz
Info on Join/Leave List: http://ifets.ieee.org/maillist.html
---------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Wed 16 Feb 2000 - 00:22:04 MET