Re: [IFETS-Discuss] Betz on Naysayers and Clark; Morrison's exception

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Subject: Re: [IFETS-Discuss] Betz on Naysayers and Clark; Morrison's exception
d.jones@cqu.edu.au
Date: Fri 23 Jun 2000 - 00:50:29 MEST


From: d.jones@cqu.edu.au
Subject: Re: [IFETS-Discuss] Betz on Naysayers and Clark; Morrison's exception
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 15:50:29 -0700

List address to send message to everyone: ifets-discuss@topica.com
Details of current discussion: http://ifets.ieee.org/discussions/discuss.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
G'day All,

If one accepts that effectiveness comparison studies are possible
then the combination of "The No Significant Difference Phenomenon"
http://cuda.teleeducation.nb.ca/nosignificantdifference/
and the "Significant Difference" collecton
http://cuda.teleeducation.nb.ca/significantdifference/
seems to imply that proof has already been given.

Commenting on the "no signficant difference phenomemon"
Moore and Kearsly (Research on Effectiveness, in
Distance Education: A Systems View, 1996) concluded
1. There is not sufficient evidence to support the idea that
    classroom training is the optimum delivery method
2. Instruction at a distance can be as effective in bringing
    about learning as classroom instruction
3. The absence of face-to-face contact is not in itself
    detrimental to the learning process
4. What makes any course good or poor is a consequence of how
    well it is designed, delivered, and conducted, not whether
    the students are face-to-face or at a distance

It could be argued that non-traditional forms of teaching and learning
may actually be at an advantage since
- most reported uses of "net methods", especially
  Web-based technology, are first time uses of those methods
- yet there is still (if you accept the "no significant difference
  phenomenon) no significant difference to the effectiveness of
  traditional methods
- experience with new forms of teaching and learning should only
  improve the non-traditional methods

David.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Jones  (d.jones@cqu.edu.au)    | "You can't trust code that you
Informatics and Communication        |  did not totally create
Central Queensland University        |  yourself."
Rockhampton, Australia               |  -- Ken Thompson.
------------ http://cq-pan.cqu.edu.au/david-jones/
----------------------

--------------------------------------------------------- Forum website: http://ifets.ieee.org/ Forum's contact person: kinshuk@massey.ac.nz Info on Join/Leave List: http://ifets.ieee.org/maillist.html Change your subscription options (digest, vacation hold etc.) at: http://www.topica.com/lists/ifets-discuss/prefs --------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________ T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16 Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Fri 23 Jun 2000 - 00:50:40 MEST