Arthur M. Recesso (amrecess@valdosta.edu)
Mon, 19 Apr 1999 10:58:43 -0500
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 10:58:43 -0500 From: "Arthur M. Recesso" <amrecess@valdosta.edu> Subject: Tech Damaged Educ Process
List address to send message to everyone: ifets-discuss@LISTSERV.READADP.COM
Details of current discussion: http://ifets.gmd.de/discuss.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree with Cheryl Diermyer. Technology has not damaged the educational process.
In the worst-case scenarios the technology is only being used to do "more of the same'
(or not used at all). For example, there are many cases where the teachers have been
given a computer lab to work with and told to use it for class instruction. There is
no training provided and no direction given. The teacher is expected to determine on
their own how to change the class instruction. Typically the traditional lecture and
"push" of knowledge will continue. Only now the students are sitting in a lab in
front of a computer. Of course this is not the result in ALL schools, but from my
experience I would guess this happens in the majority of schools that purchase
computer labs as their first step of technology implementation with the expectation
that it will change classroom learning. In this "worst-case scenario" the student is
still learning how to use the computer and is becoming familiar with its capabilities
and usefulness.
School districts that implement computer-related technology with a focus on
student learning, as opposed to the technology itself, change more than just the
classroom location. The teachers have available to them more resources and materials
specific to their needs than ever before. With some dedication to training that
advocates a learner-focused model for teaching, teachers are able to re-design the
curriculum to integrate technology. During the training teachers should be learning
about the great resources out there providing examples of HOW to effectively implement
technology in their subject area. In time, the teachers are developing their own
materials to meet the specific needs of their students. I would not consider this
damaging the educational process.
Art
________________________________
Dr. Arthur M. Recesso
Assistant Professor
Education Center Room 150
Department of Secondary Education, Curriculum,
and Instructional Technology.
Valdosta State University
Valdosta, GA 31698
(912)259-5099
---------------------------------------------------------
Forum website: http://ifets.gmd.de/
Forum's contact person: kinshuk@ieee.org
Info on Join/Leave List: http://ifets.gmd.de/maillist.html
---------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Tue 20 Apr 1999 - 11:53:27 MET DST