Subject: [IFETS-DISCUSSION:4498] Re: [deanz-discuss] Theory for E-learning
From: Kinshuk (kinshuk@massey.ac.nz)
Date: Wed 12 Mar 2003 - 04:41:50 MET
From: "Kinshuk" <kinshuk@massey.ac.nz> Subject: [IFETS-DISCUSSION:4498] Re: [deanz-discuss] Theory for E-learning Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:41:50 +1300
From: Bill Anderson <w.g.anderson@massey.ac.nz>
To: deanz-discuss@massey.ac.nz
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:09:18 +1300
Subject: Re: [deanz-discuss] Theory for E-learning
Giorgio
to me your statement proves that one class has access to a greater set of
resources, not necessarily that the learning that occurs is in anyway
different. You might well be able to do more and better in class B, but
while the tools of learning might be different, are the processes? You
might be able to argue for a modified approach to teaching, but I'm not
even sure about that.
imagine...
Suppose you have a class A without any access to audio- or video-record and
playback devices; and a class B with them for teacher and students. In
class B you can do anything is done in class A but not viceversa. That
proves that learning and 'AV-learning' are different. do we need a new
theory here?
bill
---------------------------------------------------------
List address to send message to everyone:
ifets-discussion@catfish.valdosta.edu
Details of current discussion: http://ifets.ieee.org/discussions/discuss.html
Forum website: http://ifets.ieee.org/
Forum's contact person: kinshuk@massey.ac.nz
Info on Join/Leave List: http://ifets.ieee.org/maillist.html
---------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Wed 12 Mar 2003 - 05:01:06 MET