[IFETS-DISCUSSION:4478] Discussion Topic - Theory for eLearning

Subject: [IFETS-DISCUSSION:4478] Discussion Topic - Theory for eLearning
cnelson@cougar.kean.edu
Date: Mon 10 Mar 2003 - 13:31:01 MET

• Next message: P.Twining@open.ac.uk: "[IFETS-DISCUSSION:4478] Theory for E-learning paper"
• Previous message: Brian Mulligan: "[IFETS-DISCUSSION:4476] Anotherr use for MC questions"

From: cnelson@cougar.kean.edu
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 07:31:01 -0500
Subject: [IFETS-DISCUSSION:4478] Discussion Topic - Theory for eLearning

As I look at these hypotheses and substitute the word Learning for eLearning, I
wonder if there is anything that makes eLearning distinct from non-eLearning.
Should there be hypotheses that are peculiar to eLearning as opposed to
Learning? If not, then why would a theory of eLearning be necessary?

Charles Nelson
cnelson@kean.edu
---------------------------------------------------------
List address to send message to everyone:
ifets-discussion@catfish.valdosta.edu
Details of current discussion: http://ifets.ieee.org/discussions/discuss.html
Forum website: http://ifets.ieee.org/
Forum's contact person: kinshuk@massey.ac.nz
Info on Join/Leave List: http://ifets.ieee.org/maillist.html
---------------------------------------------------------

• Next message: P.Twining@open.ac.uk: "[IFETS-DISCUSSION:4478] Theory for E-learning paper"
• Previous message: Brian Mulligan: "[IFETS-DISCUSSION:4476] Anotherr use for MC questions"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Mon 10 Mar 2003 - 15:21:05 MET